Crime
“I wish to make it very clear that I reject the notion that unfaithful and unsubstantiated rumors unfold on the web can drive a decide to recuse herself from a case.”
The decide overseeing the courtroom proceedings towards Karen A. Learn shot down a request from protection attorneys to recuse herself on Tuesday, disputing claims that she has ties to folks concerned within the case.
Alan Jackson, considered one of Learn’s attorneys, argued that there was an “simple erosion of public confidence” in Choose Beverly Cannone’s means to be truthful within the contentious case, which has drawn in depth information protection and social media debate.
Learn is charged within the Jan. 29, 2022 dying of her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O’Keefe. Prosecutors say she struck O’Keefe together with her SUV whereas dropping him off on the Canton house of a fellow Boston police officer, Brian Albert, following an evening out.
Learn has pleaded not responsible to prices of second-degree homicide, motorized vehicle manslaughter whereas driving below the affect, and leaving the scene of a collision inflicting damage and dying.
Legal professionals for the Mansfield lady have pushed an alternate concept that O’Keefe was crushed, and that the householders and different company conspired to border Learn for his dying.
Tuesday’s listening to was often disrupted as unmuted spectators jockeyed to pay attention in remotely, marking the newest in a authorized saga that has captured the general public’s consideration.
Karen Learn decide pushes again on ‘unfaithful and unsubstantiated rumors’
Arguing in favor of Cannone’s recusal, Jackson emphasised that the protection was not stating that the decide couldn’t be truthful or neutral.
“Solely the courtroom is aware of the reply to that query,” he stated. “However the information we’ve offered unquestionably are such that the general public would possibly — and that’s the important thing phrase — the general public would possibly doubt the courtroom’s equity in some regard. And that’s all that’s required for this courtroom to do the proper factor and step apart from this case.”
Jackson alleged that Cannone had a “routine apply” of failing to behave on protection motions in a well timed method. He additionally pointed to a message {that a} purported relative of Jennifer McCabe — Albert’s sister-in-law — allegedly despatched to the weblog Turtleboy, which has promoted theories that Learn was framed.
Learn’s attorneys held up a print-out of the alternate, which exhibits the blogger asking a couple of connection to Cannone. McCabe’s relative allegedly responded, “Auntie Bev??? Whose seaside cottage do you suppose we’re gonna bury your corpse below?”
Norfolk Assistant District Legal professional Adam Lally argued that the messages have been between two people “who’ve actually nothing to do with this case” and stated they have been “divorced from the context through which this communication arises,” referencing earlier statements and weblog posts.
Jackson additionally cited a 2022 Venmo fee for a seaside home rental that allegedly referenced Cannone, although the decide identified that the identify “Beverley” within the fee description didn’t match her spelling. Furthermore, she stated she has by no means rented out her Cape Cod house.
“And doesn’t that underscore the truth that anyone can say or write something and attempt to make it the premise of a movement to recuse? And I feel it factors out that this movement to recuse is just not credible,” Cannone stated.
She added: “I wish to make it very clear that I reject the notion that unfaithful and unsubstantiated rumors unfold on the web can drive a decide to recuse herself from a case.”
Cannone supplied Learn’s attorneys a chance to enchantment the choice, however Jackson stated the protection workforce is just not contemplating an enchantment right now.
However what concerning the ‘media circus’?
The decide subsequent thought-about a request from prosecutors to bar Learn’s attorneys from talking about sure points of the case exterior the courtroom.
Lally famous that the proposed order doesn’t goal to cease Learn or her attorneys from talking to the media, however as an alternative “seeks to ban counsel addressing the media or addressing the deserves of the case throughout the media or utilizing the media as a propagandist to advance its concept of the case.”
He accused the protection workforce of “cherry-picking” sure items of proof and releasing them to the media out of context, additionally claiming that witnesses within the case have confronted harassment in consequence.
Protection legal professional David Yannetti argued that prosecutors didn’t see a necessity for restrictions till public discourse swayed in his consumer’s favor.
“They have been fairly proud of the press this case was getting when it was of their favor and their minions have been out doing their work with the media,” he stated, later including, “We didn’t create this media circus; the prosecution did.”
Yannetti additionally questioned prosecutors’ intentions.
“Does the prosecution suppose that in the event that they stuff a gag within the mouths of Karen Learn’s attorneys, that these good reporters behind me are merely going to go away? Do they suppose that most people’s gonna go away?” he requested. “Should you gag us, your honor, the extrajudicial dialog won’t finish. If something, it should solely intensify.”
Cannone didn’t rule on the movement Tuesday and stated she would take the matter below advisement. Learn is due again in courtroom on Sept. 15; a trial date has not been set.
E-newsletter Signup
Keep updated on all the newest information from Boston.com